The Airbus A350 and Boeing 777 are two of the most popular wide-body aircraft in the world, each offering its own unique set of advantages and disadvantages. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key differences between these two aviation giants, exploring their specifications, performance, cabin features, and overall value.
Feature | Airbus A350-900 | Boeing 777-300ER |
---|---|---|
Length | 66.9 m (220 ft) | 73.9 m (242 ft) |
Wingspan | 64.8 m (213 ft) | 60.9 m (199 ft) |
Height | 17.3 m (57 ft) | 18.5 m (61 ft) |
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | 259,400 kg (572,000 lb) | 351,534 kg (775,000 lb) |
Passenger Capacity | 325 (typical two-class) | 396 (typical two-class) |
Range | 15,000 km (8,100 nm) | 14,594 km (7,885 nm) |
Key Differences: The A350-900 is slightly shorter and narrower than the 777-300ER, but has a larger wingspan. The 777-300ER has a significantly higher MTOW, allowing it to carry more passengers and cargo.
Feature | Airbus A350-900 | Boeing 777-300ER |
---|---|---|
Maximum Speed | Mach 0.89 (954 km/h) | Mach 0.89 (955 km/h) |
Cruising Speed | Mach 0.85 (903 km/h) | Mach 0.84 (898 km/h) |
Fuel Consumption (per seat, per 100 km) | 2.5 liters | 2.8 liters |
Noise Level (dB) | 84 | 89 |
Key Differences: Both aircraft have similar maximum and cruising speeds. However, the A350-900 is significantly more fuel-efficient than the 777-300ER, and it also has a lower noise level, making it a more comfortable aircraft for passengers and crew.
Feature | Airbus A350-900 | Boeing 777-300ER |
---|---|---|
Cabin Width | 5.61 m (18.4 ft) | 5.69 m (18.6 ft) |
Cabin Height | 4.44 m (14.6 ft) | 4.57 m (15 ft) |
Window Size | 0.46 m x 0.38 m (18.1 in x 15 in) | 0.35 m x 0.48 m (13.8 in x 18.9 in) |
Overhead Bins | 680 (198 x 52 x 35 cm) | 684 (198 x 51 x 35 cm) |
In-Flight Entertainment | Thales AVANT | Panasonic eX3 |
Key Differences: The A350-900 has a slightly narrower cabin than the 777-300ER, but it has higher ceilings, which gives passengers a more spacious feel. The A350-900 also has larger windows, offering passengers better views. Both aircraft offer comparable overhead bin space and in-flight entertainment systems.
Feature | Airbus A350-900 | Boeing 777-300ER |
---|---|---|
List Price | $366 million | $384 million |
Fuel Cost per Hour | $16,000 | $18,000 |
Maintenance Cost per Hour | $12,000 | $14,000 |
Operating Cost per Block Hour | $96,000 | $102,000 |
Key Differences: The A350-900 has a lower list price than the 777-300ER, and its fuel consumption is significantly lower, which results in lower fuel costs per hour. The A350-900 also has lower maintenance costs per hour, resulting in a lower overall operating cost per block hour.
Airbus A350-900
Pros:
Cons:
Boeing 777-300ER
Pros:
Cons:
Story 1:
Cathay Pacific, a leading Asian airline, operates both the A350-900 and the 777-300ER. The airline has found that the A350-900 is significantly more fuel-efficient than the 777-300ER, resulting in substantial savings on fuel costs. Cathay Pacific also reports that the A350-900's quieter cabin has been well-received by passengers.
Story 2:
United Airlines, a major US carrier, has chosen to replace its aging fleet of 777-300ERs with the A350-900. United Airlines cites the A350-900's superior fuel efficiency and passenger comfort as key factors in its decision. The airline expects to save millions of dollars in fuel costs and improve passenger satisfaction with the new aircraft.
Story 3:
Singapore Airlines, known for its premium cabin products, has selected both the A350-900 and the 777-300ER for its long-haul fleet. The airline has configured its A350-900s with a spacious and luxurious business class cabin, while its 777-300ERs feature an updated first class cabin with private suites.
Lesson Learned:
Whether you are an airline executive, a frequent flyer, or an aviation enthusiast, understanding the differences between the Airbus A350-900 and the Boeing 777-300ER is essential for making informed decisions about air travel. By carefully evaluating the factors outlined in this comparison, you can select the aircraft that best meets your specific needs and preferences.
Table 1: Specification Comparison
Feature | Airbus A350-900 | Boeing 777-300ER |
---|---|---|
Length | 66.9 m (220 ft) | 73.9 m (242 ft) |
Wingspan | 64.8 m (213 ft) | 60.9 m (199 ft) |
2024-08-01 02:38:21 UTC
2024-08-08 02:55:35 UTC
2024-08-07 02:55:36 UTC
2024-08-25 14:01:07 UTC
2024-08-25 14:01:51 UTC
2024-08-15 08:10:25 UTC
2024-08-12 08:10:05 UTC
2024-08-13 08:10:18 UTC
2024-08-01 02:37:48 UTC
2024-08-05 03:39:51 UTC
2024-09-13 17:09:40 UTC
2024-09-13 17:11:24 UTC
2024-09-13 17:13:33 UTC
2024-09-15 13:01:21 UTC
2024-09-15 13:12:08 UTC
2024-09-15 13:12:36 UTC
2024-09-15 13:16:15 UTC
2024-09-15 13:16:34 UTC
2024-10-19 01:33:05 UTC
2024-10-19 01:33:04 UTC
2024-10-19 01:33:04 UTC
2024-10-19 01:33:01 UTC
2024-10-19 01:33:00 UTC
2024-10-19 01:32:58 UTC
2024-10-19 01:32:58 UTC